can: mcp251x: Call wrapper instead of regulator_disable()
There is no need to check for regulator presence in the ->suspend() since a wrapper does it for us. Due to this we may unconditionally set AFTER_SUSPEND_POWER flag. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Marc Kleine-Budde
parent
8de29a5c34
commit
761a615917
@ -1142,10 +1142,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused mcp251x_can_suspend(struct device *dev)
|
||||
priv->after_suspend = AFTER_SUSPEND_DOWN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->power)) {
|
||||
regulator_disable(priv->power);
|
||||
priv->after_suspend |= AFTER_SUSPEND_POWER;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mcp251x_power_enable(priv->power, 0);
|
||||
priv->after_suspend |= AFTER_SUSPEND_POWER;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user