net/mlx5: Use kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc()
Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc(). Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Saeed Mahameed
parent
f62eb932d8
commit
806bf340e1
@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ int mlx5_cmd_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cmd->stats = kvzalloc(MLX5_CMD_OP_MAX * sizeof(*cmd->stats), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
cmd->stats = kvcalloc(MLX5_CMD_OP_MAX, sizeof(*cmd->stats), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!cmd->stats)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ mlx5_eswitch_add_send_to_vport_meta_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
|
||||
u16 vport_num;
|
||||
|
||||
num_vfs = esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs;
|
||||
flows = kvzalloc(num_vfs * sizeof(*flows), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
flows = kvcalloc(num_vfs, sizeof(*flows), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!flows)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static int esw_add_fdb_peer_miss_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
|
||||
peer_miss_rules_setup(esw, peer_dev, spec, &dest);
|
||||
|
||||
flows = kvzalloc(nvports * sizeof(*flows), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
flows = kvcalloc(nvports, sizeof(*flows), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!flows) {
|
||||
err = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto alloc_flows_err;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user