commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream.
When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to
have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot
and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing
a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail.
Example reproducer:
$ cat test-send-rmdir.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
mkdir $MNT/dir
touch $MNT/dir/file1
touch $MNT/dir/file2
touch $MNT/dir/file3
# Filesystem looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- dir/ (ino 257)
# |----- file1 (ino 258)
# |----- file2 (ino 259)
# |----- file3 (ino 260)
#
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1
# Now remove our directory and all its files.
rm -fr $MNT/dir
# Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that
# the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number
# that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid"
# available after mounting again the filesystem.
umount $MNT
mount $DEV $MNT
# Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well).
touch $MNT/newfile
# Filesystem now looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- newfile (ino 257)
#
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2
# Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply
# both send streams to recreate both snapshots.
umount $DEV
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT
umount $MNT
When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream
fails:
$ ./test-send-rmdir.sh
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory
So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode
number and generation number, instead of only inode number.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5e84c99055