[ Upstream commit dab48b8f2fe7264d51ec9eed0adea0fe3c78830a ]
After repairing a corrupted file system with exfatprogs' fsck.exfat,
zero-size directories may result. It is also possible to create
zero-size directories in other exFAT implementation, such as Paragon
ufsd dirver.
As described in the specification, the lower directory size limits
is 0 bytes.
Without this commit, sub-directories and files cannot be created
under a zero-size directory, and it cannot be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d42334578eba1390859012ebb91e1e556d51db49 ]
exfat_extract_uni_name copies characters from a given file name entry into
the 'uniname' variable. This variable is actually defined on the stack of
the exfat_readdir() function. According to the definition of
the 'exfat_uni_name' type, the file name should be limited 255 characters
(+ null teminator space), but the exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry()
function can write more characters because there is no check if filename
entries exceeds max filename length. This patch add the check not to copy
filename characters when exceeding max filename length.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reported-by: Maxim Suhanov <dfirblog@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a3ff29a95fde16906304455aa8c0bd84eb770258 ]
In special cases, a file or a directory may occupied more than 19
directory entries, pre-allocating 3 bh is not enough. Such as
- Support vendor secondary directory entry in the future.
- Since file directory entry is damaged, the SecondaryCount
field is bigger than 18.
So this commit supports dynamic allocation of bh.
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: d42334578eba ("exfat: check if filename entries exceeds max filename length")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c6e2f52e3051e8d898d38840104638ca8bbcdec2 ]
When directory iterate and lookup is called, there's a buggy rewinding
of start point for traversing cluster chain to the parent directory
entry's first cluster. This caused repeated cluster chain traversing
from the first entry of the parent directory that would show worse
performance if huge amounts of files exist under the parent directory.
Fix not to rewind, make continue from currently referenced cluster and
dir entry.
Tested with 50,000 files under single directory / 256GB sdcard,
with command "time ls -l > /dev/null",
Before : 0m08.69s real 0m00.27s user 0m05.91s system
After : 0m07.01s real 0m00.25s user 0m04.34s system
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Stable-dep-of: d42334578eba ("exfat: check if filename entries exceeds max filename length")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit daf60d6cca26e50d65dac374db92e58de745ad26 upstream.
The call stack shown below is a scenario in the Linux 4.19 kernel.
Allocating memory failed where exfat fs use kmalloc_array due to
system memory fragmentation, while the u-disk was inserted without
recognition.
Devices such as u-disk using the exfat file system are pluggable and
may be insert into the system at any time.
However, long-term running systems cannot guarantee the continuity of
physical memory. Therefore, it's necessary to address this issue.
Binder:2632_6: page allocation failure: order:4,
mode:0x6040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null)
Call trace:
[242178.097582] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4
[242178.097589] dump_stack+0xf4/0x134
[242178.097598] warn_alloc+0xd8/0x144
[242178.097603] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1364/0x1384
[242178.097608] kmalloc_order+0x2c/0x510
[242178.097612] kmalloc_order_trace+0x40/0x16c
[242178.097618] __kmalloc+0x360/0x408
[242178.097624] load_alloc_bitmap+0x160/0x284
[242178.097628] exfat_fill_super+0xa3c/0xe7c
[242178.097635] mount_bdev+0x2e8/0x3a0
[242178.097638] exfat_fs_mount+0x40/0x50
[242178.097643] mount_fs+0x138/0x2e8
[242178.097649] vfs_kern_mount+0x90/0x270
[242178.097655] do_mount+0x798/0x173c
[242178.097659] ksys_mount+0x114/0x1ac
[242178.097665] __arm64_sys_mount+0x24/0x34
[242178.097671] el0_svc_common+0xb8/0x1b8
[242178.097676] el0_svc_handler+0x74/0x90
[242178.097681] el0_svc+0x8/0x340
By analyzing the exfat code,we found that continuous physical memory
is not required here,so kvmalloc_array is used can solve this problem.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: gaoming <gaoming20@hihonor.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 39c1ce8eafc0ff64fb9e28536ccc7df6a8e2999d upstream.
inode->i_blocks is not real number of blocks, but 512 byte ones.
Fixes: 98d917047e ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Tested-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit bdaadfd343e3cba49ad0b009ff4b148dad0fa404 upstream.
When a file or a directory is deleted, the hint for the cluster of
its parent directory in its in-memory inode is set as DIR_DELETED.
Therefore, DIR_DELETED must be one of invalid cluster numbers. According
to the exFAT specification, a volume can have at most 2^32-11 clusters.
However, DIR_DELETED is wrongly defined as 0xFFFF0321, which could be
a valid cluster number. To fix it, let's redefine DIR_DELETED as
0xFFFFFFF7, the bad cluster number.
Fixes: 1acf1a564b ("exfat: add in-memory and on-disk structures and headers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6cb5d1a16a51d080fbc1649a5144cbc5ca7d6f88 upstream.
If the position is not aligned with the dentry size, the return
value of readdir() will be NULL and errno is 0, which means the
end of the directory stream is reached.
If the position is aligned with dentry size, but there is no file
or directory at the position, exfat_readdir() will continue to
get dentry from the next dentry. So the dentry gotten by readdir()
may not be at the position.
After this commit, if the position is not aligned with the dentry
size, round the position up to the dentry size and continue to get
the dentry.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 706fdcac002316893434d753be8cfb549fe1d40d upstream.
Since seekdir() does not check whether the position is valid, the
position may exceed the size of the directory. We found that for
a directory with discontinuous clusters, if the position exceeds
the size of the directory and the excess size is greater than or
equal to the cluster size, exfat_readdir() will return -EIO,
causing a file system error and making the file system unavailable.
Reproduce this bug by:
seekdir(dir, dir_size + cluster_size);
dirent = readdir(dir);
The following log will be printed if mount with 'errors=remount-ro'.
[11166.712896] exFAT-fs (sdb1): error, invalid access to FAT (entry 0xffffffff)
[11166.712905] exFAT-fs (sdb1): Filesystem has been set read-only
Fixes: 1e5654de0f51 ("exfat: handle wrong stream entry size in exfat_readdir()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 64ba4b15e5c045f8b746c6da5fc9be9a6b00b61d upstream.
Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds read in exfat_clear_bitmap.
This was triggered by reproducer calling truncute with size 0,
which causes the following trace:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888115aa9508 by task syz-executor251/365
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e2/0x24b lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_address_description+0x81/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:233
__kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline]
kasan_report+0x1a4/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:436
__asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report_generic.c:309
exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
exfat_free_cluster+0x25a/0x4a0 fs/exfat/fatent.c:181
__exfat_truncate+0x99e/0xe00 fs/exfat/file.c:217
exfat_truncate+0x11b/0x4f0 fs/exfat/file.c:243
exfat_setattr+0xa03/0xd40 fs/exfat/file.c:339
notify_change+0xb76/0xe10 fs/attr.c:336
do_truncate+0x1ea/0x2d0 fs/open.c:65
Move the is_valid_cluster() helper from fatent.c to a common
header to make it reusable in other *.c files. And add is_valid_cluster()
to validate if cluster number is within valid range in exfat_clear_bitmap()
and exfat_set_bitmap().
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=50381fc73821ecae743b8cf24b4c9a04776f767c
Reported-by: syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1e49a94cf7 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 839a534f1e853f1aec100d06040c0037b89c2dc3 upstream.
In d_make_root, when we fail to allocate dentry for root inode,
we will iput root inode and returned value is NULL in this function.
So we do not need to release this inode again at d_make_root's caller.
Signed-off-by: Chen Li <chenli@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 92fba084b79e6bc7b12fc118209f1922c1a2df56 ]
In exfat_truncate(), the computation of inode->i_blocks is wrong if
the file is larger than 4 GiB because a 32-bit variable is used as a
mask. This is fixed and simplified by using round_up().
Also fix the same buggy computation in exfat_read_root() and another
(correct) one in exfat_fill_inode(). The latter was fixed another way
last month but can be simplified by using round_up() as well. See:
commit 0c336d6e33f4 ("exfat: fix incorrect loading of i_blocks for
large files")
Fixes: 98d917047e ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Vu-Brugier <christophe.vu-brugier@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 0c336d6e33f4bedc443404c89f43c91c8bd9ee11 upstream.
When calculating i_blocks, there was a mistake that was masked with a
32-bit variable. So i_blocks for files larger than 4 GiB had incorrect
values. Mask with a 64-bit variable instead of 32-bit one.
Fixes: 5f2aa07507 ("exfat: add inode operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: Ganapathi Kamath <hgkamath@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1e5654de0f51890f88abd409ebf4867782431e81 upstream.
The compatibility issue between linux exfat and exfat of some camera
company was reported from Florian. In their exfat, if the number of files
exceeds any limit, the DataLength in stream entry of the directory is
no longer updated. So some files created from camera does not show in
linux exfat. because linux exfat doesn't allow that cpos becomes larger
than DataLength of stream entry. This patch check DataLength in stream
entry only if the type is ALLOC_NO_FAT_CHAIN and add the check ensure
that dentry offset does not exceed max dentries size(256 MB) to avoid
the circular FAT chain issue.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9
Reported-by: Florian Cramer <flrncrmr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77edfc6e51055b61cae2f54c8e6c3bb7c762e4fe upstream.
If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear
cluster bit to remove file. But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector
calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size which is 2,
leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster.
With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap
functions.
Fixes: 1e49a94cf7 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 78c276f5495aa53a8beebb627e5bf6a54f0af34f upstream.
syzbot reported a warning which could cause shift-out-of-bounds issue.
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
dump_stack+0x183/0x22e lib/dump_stack.c:120
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:148 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x432/0x4d0 lib/ubsan.c:395
exfat_read_boot_sector fs/exfat/super.c:471 [inline]
__exfat_fill_super fs/exfat/super.c:556 [inline]
exfat_fill_super+0x2acb/0x2d00 fs/exfat/super.c:624
get_tree_bdev+0x406/0x630 fs/super.c:1291
vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1496
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2881 [inline]
path_mount+0x1937/0x2c50 fs/namespace.c:3211
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3224 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3432 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3409
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
exfat specification describe sect_per_clus_bits field of boot sector
could be at most 25 - sect_size_bits and at least 0. And sect_size_bits
can also affect this calculation, It also needs validation.
This patch add validation for sect_per_clus_bits and sect_size_bits
field of boot sector.
Fixes: 719c1e1829 ("exfat: add super block operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
Reported-by: syzbot+da4fe66aaadd3c2e2d1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Pull misc vfs updates from Al Viro:
"Assorted stuff all over the place (the largest group here is
Christoph's stat cleanups)"
* 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
fs: remove KSTAT_QUERY_FLAGS
fs: remove vfs_stat_set_lookup_flags
fs: move vfs_fstatat out of line
fs: implement vfs_stat and vfs_lstat in terms of vfs_fstatat
fs: remove vfs_statx_fd
fs: omfs: use kmemdup() rather than kmalloc+memcpy
[PATCH] reduce boilerplate in fsid handling
fs: Remove duplicated flag O_NDELAY occurring twice in VALID_OPEN_FLAGS
selftests: mount: add nosymfollow tests
Add a "nosymfollow" mount option.
In exfat_move_file(), the identity of source and target directory has been
checked by the caller.
Also, it gets stream.start_clu from file dir-entry, which is an invalid
determination.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the parameter of
exfat_readdir().
Since rwoffset is referenced only by exfat_readdir(), it is not necessary
a exfat_inode_info's member.
Also, change cpos to point to the next of entry-set, and return the index
of dir-entry via dir_entry->entry.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
There is nothing in directory just created, so there is no need to scan.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
The exfat_find_dir_entry() called by exfat_find() doesn't return -EEXIST.
Therefore, the root-dir information setting is never executed.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We alreday has the interface i_blocksize() to get blocksize,
so use it.
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Fix missing result check of exfat_build_inode().
And use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead of PTR_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
MediaFailure and VolumeDirty should be retained if these are set before
mounting.
In '3.1.13.3 Media Failure Field' of exfat specification describe:
If, upon mounting a volume, the value of this field is 1,
implementations which scan the entire volume for media failures and
record all failures as "bad" clusters in the FAT (or otherwise resolve
media failures) may clear the value of this field to 0.
Therefore, We should not clear MediaFailure without scanning volume.
In '8.1 Recommended Write Ordering' of exfat specification describe:
Clear the value of the VolumeDirty field to 0, if its value prior to
the first step was 0.
Therefore, We should not clear VolumeDirty after mounting.
Also rename ERR_MEDIUM to MEDIA_FAILURE.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Replace part of exfat_zeroed_cluster() with exfat_update_bhs().
And remove exfat_sync_bhs().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Write multiple sectors at once when updating dir-entries.
Add exfat_update_bhs() for that. It wait for write completion once
instead of sector by sector.
It's only effective if sync enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
This flag is set/reset in exfat_put_super()/exfat_sync_fs()
to avoid sync_blockdev().
- exfat_put_super():
Before calling this, the VFS has already called sync_filesystem(),
so sync is never performed here.
- exfat_sync_fs():
After calling this, the VFS calls sync_blockdev(), so, it is meaningless
to check EXFAT_SB_DIRTY or to bypass sync_blockdev() here.
Remove the EXFAT_SB_DIRTY check to ensure synchronization.
And remove the code related to the flag.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
On-disk format for name_hash field is LE, so it must be explicitly
transformed on BE system for proper result.
Fixes: 370e812b3e ("exfat: add nls operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Ponetayev <i.ponetaev@ndmsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
The stream.size field is updated to the value of create timestamp
of the file entry. Fix this to use correct stream entry pointer.
Fixes: 29bbb14bfc ("exfat: fix incorrect update of stream entry in __exfat_truncate()")
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We found the wrong hint_stat initialization in exfat_find_dir_entry().
It should be initialized when cluster is EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER.
Fixes: ca06197382 ("exfat: add directory operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
An overflow issue can occur while calculating sector in
exfat_cluster_to_sector(). It needs to cast clus's type to sector_t
before left shifting.
Fixes: 1acf1a564b ("exfat: add in-memory and on-disk structures and headers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
generic_file_fsync() exfat used could not guarantee the consistency of
a file because it has flushed not dirty metadata but only dirty data pages
for a file.
Instead of that, use exfat_file_fsync() for files and directories so that
it guarantees to commit both the metadata and data pages for a file.
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
We need to commit dirty metadata and pages to disk
before remounting exfat as read-only.
This fixes a failure in xfstests generic/452
generic/452 does the following:
cp something <exfat>/
mount -o remount,ro <exfat>
the <exfat>/something is corrupted. because while
exfat is remounted as read-only, exfat doesn't
have a chance to commit metadata and
vfs invalidates page caches in a block device.
Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
If the second exfat_get_dentry() call fails then we need to release
"old_bh" before returning. There is a similar bug in exfat_move_file().
Fixes: 5f2aa07507 ("exfat: add inode operations")
Reported-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Some fsck tool complain that padding part of the FileName field
is not set to the value 0000h. So let's maintain filesystem cleaner,
as exfat's spec. recommendation.
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok.Kim <Hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
This code calls brelse(bh) and then dereferences "bh" on the next line
resulting in a possible use after free. The brelse() should just be
moved down a line.
Fixes: b676fdbcf4c8 ("exfat: standardize checksum calculation")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
There is check error in range condition that can never be entered
even with invalid input.
Replace incorrent checking code with already existing valid checker.
Signed-off-by: hyeongseok.kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
At truncate, there is a problem of incorrect updating in the file entry
pointer instead of stream entry. This will cause the problem of
overwriting the time field of the file entry to new_size. Fix it to
update stream entry.
Fixes: 98d917047e ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
kbuild test robot reported :
fs/exfat/nls.c:531:22: warning: Variable 'p_uniname->name_len'
is reassigned a value before the old one has been used.
The reassignment of p_uniname->name_len is not needed and remove it.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
