wcn36xx: ensure pairing of init_scan/finish_scan and start_scan/end_scan
[ Upstream commit 8f1ba8b0ee2679f0b3d22d2a5c1bc70c436fd872 ]
An SMD capture from the downstream prima driver on WCN3680B shows the
following command sequence for connected scans:
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 1
- end_scan_req, channel 1
- start_scan_req, channel 2
- ...
- end_scan_req, channel 3
- finish_scan_req
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 4
- ...
- end_scan_req, channel 6
- finish_scan_req
- ...
- end_scan_req, channel 165
- finish_scan_req
Upstream currently never calls wcn36xx_smd_end_scan, and in some cases[1]
still sends finish_scan_req twice in a row or before init_scan_req. A
typical connected scan looks like this:
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 1
- finish_scan_req
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 2
- ...
- start_scan_req, channel 165
- finish_scan_req
- finish_scan_req
This patch cleans up scanning so that init/finish and start/end are always
paired together and correctly nested.
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 1
- end_scan_req, channel 1
- finish_scan_req
- init_scan_req
- start_scan_req, channel 2
- end_scan_req, channel 2
- ...
- start_scan_req, channel 165
- end_scan_req, channel 165
- finish_scan_req
Note that upstream will not do batching of 3 active-probe scans before
returning to the operating channel, and this patch does not change that.
To match downstream in this aspect, adjust IEEE80211_PROBE_DELAY and/or
the 125ms max off-channel time in ieee80211_scan_state_decision.
[1]: commit d195d7aac09b ("wcn36xx: Ensure finish scan is not requested
before start scan") addressed one case of finish_scan_req being sent
without a preceding init_scan_req (the case of the operating channel
coinciding with the first scan channel); two other cases are:
1) if SW scan is started and aborted immediately, without scanning any
channels, we send a finish_scan_req without ever sending init_scan_req,
and
2) as SW scan logic always returns us to the operating channel before
calling wcn36xx_sw_scan_complete, finish_scan_req is always sent twice
at the end of a SW scan
Fixes: 8e84c25821
("wcn36xx: mac80211 driver for Qualcomm WCN3660/WCN3680 hardware")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>
Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211027170306.555535-4-benl@squareup.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e53ff4dd70
commit
fcb267bb95
@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ static void wcn36xx_change_opchannel(struct wcn36xx *wcn, int ch)
|
||||
static int wcn36xx_config(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 changed)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct wcn36xx *wcn = hw->priv;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_MAC, "mac config changed 0x%08x\n", changed);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -412,17 +413,31 @@ static int wcn36xx_config(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 changed)
|
||||
* want to receive/transmit regular data packets, then
|
||||
* simply stop the scan session and exit PS mode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_finish_scan(wcn, HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN,
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_channel = 0;
|
||||
if (wcn->sw_scan_channel)
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_end_scan(wcn, wcn->sw_scan_channel);
|
||||
if (wcn->sw_scan_init) {
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_finish_scan(wcn, HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN,
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (wcn->sw_scan) {
|
||||
/* A scan is ongoing, do not change the operating
|
||||
* channel, but start a scan session on the channel.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_init_scan(wcn, HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN,
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
if (wcn->sw_scan_channel)
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_end_scan(wcn, wcn->sw_scan_channel);
|
||||
if (!wcn->sw_scan_init) {
|
||||
/* This can fail if we are unable to notify the
|
||||
* operating channel.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = wcn36xx_smd_init_scan(wcn,
|
||||
HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN,
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wcn->conf_mutex);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_start_scan(wcn, ch);
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_channel = ch;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
wcn36xx_change_opchannel(wcn, ch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -709,7 +724,12 @@ static void wcn36xx_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
||||
struct wcn36xx *wcn = hw->priv;
|
||||
|
||||
/* ensure that any scan session is finished */
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_finish_scan(wcn, HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN, wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
if (wcn->sw_scan_channel)
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_end_scan(wcn, wcn->sw_scan_channel);
|
||||
if (wcn->sw_scan_init) {
|
||||
wcn36xx_smd_finish_scan(wcn, HAL_SYS_MODE_SCAN,
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_vif);
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan = false;
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_opchannel = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -730,6 +730,7 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_init_scan(struct wcn36xx *wcn, enum wcn36xx_hal_sys_mode mode,
|
||||
wcn36xx_err("hal_init_scan response failed err=%d\n", ret);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_init = true;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wcn->hal_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_start_scan(struct wcn36xx *wcn, u8 scan_channel)
|
||||
wcn36xx_err("hal_start_scan response failed err=%d\n", ret);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_channel = scan_channel;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wcn->hal_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -790,6 +792,7 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_end_scan(struct wcn36xx *wcn, u8 scan_channel)
|
||||
wcn36xx_err("hal_end_scan response failed err=%d\n", ret);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_channel = 0;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wcn->hal_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -831,6 +834,7 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_finish_scan(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
|
||||
wcn36xx_err("hal_finish_scan response failed err=%d\n", ret);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
wcn->sw_scan_init = false;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wcn->hal_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ struct wcn36xx {
|
||||
struct cfg80211_scan_request *scan_req;
|
||||
bool sw_scan;
|
||||
u8 sw_scan_opchannel;
|
||||
bool sw_scan_init;
|
||||
u8 sw_scan_channel;
|
||||
struct ieee80211_vif *sw_scan_vif;
|
||||
struct mutex scan_lock;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user