rcu: Use funnel locking for synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s polling loop
This commit gets rid of synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s mutex_trylock() polling loop in favor of the funnel-locking scheme that was abstracted from synchronize_sched_expedited(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7fd0ddc5bf
commit
29fd930940
@ -3309,9 +3309,9 @@ static bool rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
|
||||
return rcu_seq_done(&rsp->expedited_sequence, s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Common code for synchronize_sched_expedited() work-done checking. */
|
||||
static bool sync_sched_exp_wd(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
atomic_long_t *stat, unsigned long s)
|
||||
/* Common code for synchronize_{rcu,sched}_expedited() work-done checking. */
|
||||
static bool sync_exp_work_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
atomic_long_t *stat, unsigned long s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s)) {
|
||||
if (rnp)
|
||||
@ -3319,7 +3319,6 @@ static bool sync_sched_exp_wd(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
/* Ensure test happens before caller kfree(). */
|
||||
smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
|
||||
atomic_long_inc(stat);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -3345,14 +3344,14 @@ static struct rcu_node *exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rnp0 = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
|
||||
for (; rnp0 != NULL; rnp0 = rnp0->parent) {
|
||||
if (sync_sched_exp_wd(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone1, s))
|
||||
if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone1, s))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rnp0->exp_funnel_mutex);
|
||||
if (rnp1)
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rnp1->exp_funnel_mutex);
|
||||
rnp1 = rnp0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (sync_sched_exp_wd(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone2, s))
|
||||
if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone2, s))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
return rnp1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3402,8 +3401,10 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
|
||||
|
||||
rnp = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
|
||||
if (rnp == NULL)
|
||||
if (rnp == NULL) {
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -536,7 +536,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
|
||||
|
||||
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return non-zero if there are any tasks in RCU read-side critical
|
||||
@ -556,7 +555,7 @@ static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
* for the current expedited grace period. Works only for preemptible
|
||||
* RCU -- other RCU implementation use other means.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
|
||||
* Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -572,7 +571,7 @@ static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
* recursively up the tree. (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
|
||||
* iteratively!)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
|
||||
* Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
bool wake)
|
||||
@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
* set the ->expmask bits on the leaf rcu_node structures to tell phase 2
|
||||
* that work is needed here.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
|
||||
* Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
@ -654,7 +653,7 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
* invoke rcu_report_exp_rnp() to clear out the upper-level ->expmask bits,
|
||||
* enabling rcu_read_unlock_special() to do the bit-clearing.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
|
||||
* Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
@ -702,29 +701,16 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp_unlock;
|
||||
struct rcu_state *rsp = rcu_state_p;
|
||||
unsigned long s;
|
||||
int trycount = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many
|
||||
* lock-acquisition failures. Of course, if someone does the
|
||||
* expedited grace period for us, just leave.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
|
||||
if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s))
|
||||
goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
|
||||
if (trycount++ < 10) {
|
||||
udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s))
|
||||
goto unlock_mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
|
||||
rnp_unlock = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
|
||||
if (rnp_unlock == NULL)
|
||||
return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
|
||||
@ -748,9 +734,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clean up and exit. */
|
||||
rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
|
||||
unlock_mb_ret:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
|
||||
mb_ret:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rnp_unlock->exp_funnel_mutex);
|
||||
smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user