Because the counters use a custom batch size, the comparison
functions need to be aware of that batch size otherwise the
comparison does not work correctly. This leads to ASSERT failures
on generic/027 like this:
XFS: Assertion failed: 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c, line: 1099
------------[ cut here ]------------
....
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81522a39>] xfs_mod_icount+0x99/0xc0
[<ffffffff815285cb>] xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb+0x28b/0x5b0
[<ffffffff8152f941>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x321/0x580
[<ffffffff81528e17>] xfs_trans_commit+0xb7/0x260
[<ffffffff81503d4d>] xfs_bmap_finish+0xcd/0x1b0
[<ffffffff8151da41>] xfs_inactive_ifree+0x1e1/0x250
[<ffffffff8151dbe0>] xfs_inactive+0x130/0x200
[<ffffffff81523a21>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x91/0xf0
[<ffffffff811f3958>] evict+0xb8/0x190
[<ffffffff811f433b>] iput+0x18b/0x1f0
[<ffffffff811e8853>] do_unlinkat+0x1f3/0x320
[<ffffffff811d548a>] ? filp_close+0x5a/0x80
[<ffffffff811e999b>] SyS_unlinkat+0x1b/0x40
[<ffffffff81e0892e>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71
This is a regression introduced by commit 501ab32 ("xfs: use generic
percpu counters for inode counter").
This patch fixes the same problem for both the inode counter and the
free block counter in the superblocks.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
8c1903d308