Locking dependency detected below possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
T0: tipc_named_rcv() tipc_rcv()
T1: [grab nametble write lock]* [grab node lock]*
T2: tipc_update_nametbl() tipc_node_link_up()
T3: tipc_nodesub_subscribe() tipc_nametbl_publish()
T4: [grab node lock]* [grab nametble write lock]*
The opposite order of holding nametbl write lock and node lock on
above two different paths may result in a deadlock. If we move the
the updating of the name table after link state named out of node
lock, the reverse order of holding locks will be eliminated, and
as a result, the deadlock risk.
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
7b8613e0a1