Oleg Nesterov 32e4e6d5cb mm/mmap.c: expand_downwards: don't require the gap if !vm_prev
expand_stack(vma) fails if address < stack_guard_gap even if there is no
vma->vm_prev.  I don't think this makes sense, and we didn't do this
before the recent commit 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap,
between vmas").

We do not need a gap in this case, any address is fine as long as
security_mmap_addr() doesn't object.

This also simplifies the code, we know that address >= prev->vm_end and
thus underflow is not possible.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628175258.GA24881@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-10 16:32:33 -07:00
..
2017-06-05 16:59:12 +02:00
2017-07-10 16:32:32 -07:00
2017-04-18 20:41:12 +02:00
2017-02-27 18:43:47 -08:00
2017-07-07 13:55:45 -07:00
2015-09-08 15:35:28 -07:00
2015-11-05 19:34:48 -08:00
2017-05-03 15:52:10 -07:00
2016-03-17 15:09:34 -07:00
2017-07-06 16:24:35 -07:00