Chao Yu 1a118ccfd6 f2fs: use spinlock for segmap_lock instead of rwlock
rwlock can provide better concurrency when there are much more readers than
writers because readers can hold the rwlock simultaneously.

But now, for segmap_lock rwlock in struct free_segmap_info, there is only one
reader 'mount' from below call path:
->f2fs_fill_super
  ->build_segment_manager
    ->build_dirty_segmap
      ->init_dirty_segmap
        ->find_next_inuse
          read_lock
          ...
          read_unlock

Now that our concurrency can not be improved since there is no other reader for
this lock, we do not need to use rwlock_t type for segmap_lock, let's replace it
with spinlock_t type.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
2015-02-11 17:04:51 -08:00
..
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-12-13 12:42:51 -08:00
2014-08-08 15:57:24 -07:00
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-12-17 18:47:01 -08:00
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-12-14 16:10:09 -08:00
2014-12-18 19:08:10 -08:00
2014-08-07 14:40:09 -04:00
2014-11-28 18:23:44 -08:00
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-12-14 16:10:09 -08:00
2014-12-21 22:42:37 +01:00
2014-12-12 09:48:17 -08:00
2014-08-07 14:40:09 -04:00
2014-11-19 13:01:20 -05:00
2014-12-08 20:39:29 -05:00
2014-10-24 00:14:38 +02:00
2014-12-10 21:31:59 -05:00
2014-12-18 11:22:02 -08:00
2014-05-06 17:39:42 -04:00
2014-08-26 09:35:56 +02:00
2014-11-10 10:06:18 +01:00
2014-11-19 13:01:25 -05:00
2014-11-19 13:01:26 -05:00