As per Intel vt-d spec, Rev 3.0 (section 10.4.45 "Virtual Command Response
Register"), the status code of "No PASID available" error in response to
the Allocate PASID command is 2, not 1. The same for "Invalid PASID" error
in response to the Free PASID command.
We will otherwise see confusing kernel log under the command failure from
guest side. Fix it.
Fixes: 24f27d32ab ("iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation")
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210227073909.432-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
PASID is defined as a few different types in iommu including "int",
"u32", and "unsigned int". To be consistent and to match with uapi
definitions, define PASID and its variations (e.g. max PASID) as "u32".
"u32" is also shorter and a little more explicit than "unsigned int".
No PASID type change in uapi although it defines PASID as __u64 in
some places.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600187413-163670-2-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
