android/android_kernel_samsung_sm8650
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Documentation: clarify firmware_class provenance and why we can't rename the module

Browse Source 
Clarify the provenance of the firmware loader firmware_class module name
and why we cannot rename the module in the future.

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Luis R. Rodriguez 2018-05-10 13:08:50 -07:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 0b92d3f680
commit f0a462970e
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fallback-mechanisms.rst
View File

@ -72,9 +72,12 @@ the firmware requested, and establishes it in the device hierarchy by
associating the device used to make the request as the device's parent.
The sysfs directory's file attributes are defined and controlled through
the new device's class (firmware_class) and group (fw_dev_attr_groups).
This is actually where the original firmware_class.c file name comes from,
as originally the only firmware loading mechanism available was the
mechanism we now use as a fallback mechanism.
This is actually where the original firmware_class module name came from,
given that originally the only firmware loading mechanism available was the
mechanism we now use as a fallback mechanism, which registers a struct class
firmware_class. Because the attributes exposed are part of the module name, the
module name firmware_class cannot be renamed in the future, to ensure backward
compatibility with old userspace.
To load firmware using the sysfs interface we expose a loading indicator,
and a file upload firmware into: