btrfs: correct wrong comment about magic number of index_cnt
There is no function named btrfs_get_inode_index_count. Explanation for magic number index_cnt=2 in btrfs_new_inode() is actually located in btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). So replace 'btrfs_get_inode_index_count' in the comment by 'btrfs_set_inode_index_count'. Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2560ebd23
commit
df6703e15c
@ -6315,7 +6315,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* index_cnt is ignored for everything but a dir,
|
||||
* btrfs_get_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic
|
||||
* btrfs_set_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic
|
||||
* number
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = 2;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user