bpf: Fix issue in verifying allow_ptr_leaks
commit d75e30dddf73449bc2d10bb8e2f1a2c446bc67a2 upstream. After we converted the capabilities of our networking-bpf program from cap_sys_admin to cap_net_admin+cap_bpf, our networking-bpf program failed to start. Because it failed the bpf verifier, and the error log is "R3 pointer comparison prohibited". A simple reproducer as follows, SEC("cls-ingress") int ingress(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct iphdr *iph = (void *)(long)skb->data + sizeof(struct ethhdr); if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end) return TC_ACT_STOLEN; return TC_ACT_OK; } Per discussion with Yonghong and Alexei [1], comparison of two packet pointers is not a pointer leak. This patch fixes it. Our local kernel is 6.1.y and we expect this fix to be backported to 6.1.y, so stable is CCed. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+Nmspr7Si+pxWn8zkE7hX-7s93ugwC+94aXSy4uQ9vBg@mail.gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823020703.3790-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b23c96589f
commit
c96c67991a
@ -10401,6 +10401,12 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* check src2 operand */
|
||||
err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg];
|
||||
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
|
||||
if (insn->imm != 0) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "BPF_JMP/JMP32 uses reserved fields\n");
|
||||
@ -10412,12 +10418,13 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
|
||||
src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg];
|
||||
if (!(reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(dst_reg) && reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(src_reg)) &&
|
||||
is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n",
|
||||
insn->src_reg);
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "BPF_JMP/JMP32 uses reserved fields\n");
|
||||
@ -10425,12 +10432,6 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* check src2 operand */
|
||||
err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg];
|
||||
is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
|
||||
|
||||
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user