KVM: SVM: Don't inject #UD if KVM attempts to skip SEV guest insn
commit cb49631ad111570f1bad37702c11c2ae07fa2e3c upstream. Don't inject a #UD if KVM attempts to "emulate" to skip an instruction for an SEV guest, and instead resume the guest and hope that it can make forward progress. When commit04c40f344d
("KVM: SVM: Inject #UD on attempted emulation for SEV guest w/o insn buffer") added the completely arbitrary #UD behavior, there were no known scenarios where a well-behaved guest would induce a VM-Exit that triggered emulation, i.e. it was thought that injecting #UD would be helpful. However, now that KVM (correctly) attempts to re-inject INT3/INTO, e.g. if a #NPF is encountered when attempting to deliver the INT3/INTO, an SEV guest can trigger emulation without a buffer, through no fault of its own. Resuming the guest and retrying the INT3/INTO is architecturally wrong, e.g. the vCPU will incorrectly re-hit code #DBs, but for SEV guests there is literally no other option that has a chance of making forward progress. Drop the #UD injection for all "skip" emulation, not just those related to INT3/INTO, even though that means that the guest will likely end up in an infinite loop instead of getting a #UD (the vCPU may also crash, e.g. if KVM emulated everything about an instruction except for advancing RIP). There's no evidence that suggests that an unexpected #UD is actually better than hanging the vCPU, e.g. a soft-hung vCPU can still respond to IRQs and NMIs to generate a backtrace. Reported-by: Wu Zongyo <wuzongyo@mail.ustc.edu.cn> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8eb933fd-2cf3-d7a9-32fe-2a1d82eac42a@mail.ustc.edu.cn Fixes:6ef88d6e36
("KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825013621.2845700-2-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3988692acc
commit
ba82001e41
@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ static void svm_set_interrupt_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int mask)
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.int_state |= SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
static bool svm_can_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
|
||||
void *insn, int insn_len);
|
||||
|
||||
static int __svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
bool commit_side_effects)
|
||||
@ -386,6 +388,14 @@ static int __svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!svm->next_rip) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* FIXME: Drop this when kvm_emulate_instruction() does the
|
||||
* right thing and treats "can't emulate" as outright failure
|
||||
* for EMULTYPE_SKIP.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!svm_can_emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_SKIP, NULL, 0))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!commit_side_effects))
|
||||
old_rflags = svm->vmcb->save.rflags;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4592,16 +4602,25 @@ static bool svm_can_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
|
||||
* and cannot be decrypted by KVM, i.e. KVM would read cyphertext and
|
||||
* decode garbage.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Inject #UD if KVM reached this point without an instruction buffer.
|
||||
* In practice, this path should never be hit by a well-behaved guest,
|
||||
* e.g. KVM doesn't intercept #UD or #GP for SEV guests, but this path
|
||||
* is still theoretically reachable, e.g. via unaccelerated fault-like
|
||||
* AVIC access, and needs to be handled by KVM to avoid putting the
|
||||
* guest into an infinite loop. Injecting #UD is somewhat arbitrary,
|
||||
* but its the least awful option given lack of insight into the guest.
|
||||
* If KVM is NOT trying to simply skip an instruction, inject #UD if
|
||||
* KVM reached this point without an instruction buffer. In practice,
|
||||
* this path should never be hit by a well-behaved guest, e.g. KVM
|
||||
* doesn't intercept #UD or #GP for SEV guests, but this path is still
|
||||
* theoretically reachable, e.g. via unaccelerated fault-like AVIC
|
||||
* access, and needs to be handled by KVM to avoid putting the guest
|
||||
* into an infinite loop. Injecting #UD is somewhat arbitrary, but
|
||||
* its the least awful option given lack of insight into the guest.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If KVM is trying to skip an instruction, simply resume the guest.
|
||||
* If a #NPF occurs while the guest is vectoring an INT3/INTO, then KVM
|
||||
* will attempt to re-inject the INT3/INTO and skip the instruction.
|
||||
* In that scenario, retrying the INT3/INTO and hoping the guest will
|
||||
* make forward progress is the only option that has a chance of
|
||||
* success (and in practice it will work the vast majority of the time).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!insn)) {
|
||||
kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
|
||||
if (!(emul_type & EMULTYPE_SKIP))
|
||||
kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user