BACKPORT: mm: lock_vma_under_rcu() must check vma->anon_vma under vma lock
lock_vma_under_rcu() tries to guarantee that __anon_vma_prepare() can't be called in the VMA-locked page fault path by ensuring that vma->anon_vma is set. However, this check happens before the VMA is locked, which means a concurrent move_vma() can concurrently call unlink_anon_vmas(), which disassociates the VMA's anon_vma. This means we can get UAF in the following scenario: THREAD 1 THREAD 2 ======== ======== <page fault> lock_vma_under_rcu() rcu_read_lock() mas_walk() check vma->anon_vma mremap() syscall move_vma() vma_start_write() unlink_anon_vmas() <syscall end> handle_mm_fault() __handle_mm_fault() handle_pte_fault() do_pte_missing() do_anonymous_page() anon_vma_prepare() __anon_vma_prepare() find_mergeable_anon_vma() mas_walk() [looks up VMA X] munmap() syscall (deletes VMA X) reusable_anon_vma() [called on freed VMA X] This is a security bug if you can hit it, although an attacker would have to win two races at once where the first race window is only a few instructions wide. This patch is based on some previous discussion with Linus Torvalds on the security list. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 5e31275cc997 ("mm: add per-VMA lock and helper functions to control it") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Bug: 293665307 (cherry picked from commit 657b5146955eba331e01b9a6ae89ce2e716ba306) [surenb: removed vma_is_tcp() call not present in 6.1] Change-Id: I4bd91e1db337ff35eb7c1d436f4372944556dd7d Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d3b37a712a
commit
890b1aabb1
28
mm/memory.c
28
mm/memory.c
@ -5428,27 +5428,28 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma))
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
|
||||
/* find_mergeable_anon_vma uses adjacent vmas which are not locked */
|
||||
if (!vma->anon_vma)
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!vma_start_read(vma))
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* find_mergeable_anon_vma uses adjacent vmas which are not locked.
|
||||
* This check must happen after vma_start_read(); otherwise, a
|
||||
* concurrent mremap() with MREMAP_DONTUNMAP could dissociate the VMA
|
||||
* from its anon_vma.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma))
|
||||
goto inval_end_read;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Due to the possibility of userfault handler dropping mmap_lock, avoid
|
||||
* it for now and fall back to page fault handling under mmap_lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
|
||||
vma_end_read(vma);
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_armed(vma))
|
||||
goto inval_end_read;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check since vm_start/vm_end might change before we lock the VMA */
|
||||
if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end)) {
|
||||
vma_end_read(vma);
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end))
|
||||
goto inval_end_read;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check if the VMA got isolated after we found it */
|
||||
if (vma->detached) {
|
||||
@ -5460,6 +5461,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return vma;
|
||||
|
||||
inval_end_read:
|
||||
vma_end_read(vma);
|
||||
inval:
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_ABORT);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user