coccinelle: irqf_oneshot: reduce the severity due to false positives
The IRQF_ONESHOT should be present for threaded IRQ using default primary handler. However intetrupt of many child devices, e.g. children of MFD, is nested thus the IRQF_ONESHOT is not needed. The coccinelle message about error misleads submitters and reviewers about the severity of the issue, so make it a warning and mention possible false positive. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7845daa8bd
commit
5d2db9bb5f
@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, ...)
|
||||
@script:python depends on org@
|
||||
p << match.p;
|
||||
@@
|
||||
msg = "ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT"
|
||||
msg = "WARNING: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT (unless it is nested IRQ)"
|
||||
coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],msg)
|
||||
|
||||
@script:python depends on report@
|
||||
p << match.p;
|
||||
@@
|
||||
msg = "ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT"
|
||||
msg = "WARNING: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT (unless it is nested IRQ)"
|
||||
coccilib.report.print_report(p[0],msg)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user