proc/fd: In proc_readfd_common use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu
When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies proc_readfd_common, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As task_lookup_fd_rcu may update the fd ctx->pos has been changed to be the fd +2 after task_lookup_fd_rcu returns. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Tested-by: Andy Lavr <andy.lavr@gmail.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-10-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-15-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9a53aeb5e
commit
5b17b61870
17
fs/proc/fd.c
17
fs/proc/fd.c
@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static int proc_readfd_common(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
|
|||||||
instantiate_t instantiate)
|
instantiate_t instantiate)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct task_struct *p = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
|
struct task_struct *p = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
|
||||||
struct files_struct *files;
|
|
||||||
unsigned int fd;
|
unsigned int fd;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!p)
|
if (!p)
|
||||||
@ -225,22 +224,18 @@ static int proc_readfd_common(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
|
if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
files = get_files_struct(p);
|
|
||||||
if (!files)
|
|
||||||
goto out;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
for (fd = ctx->pos - 2;
|
for (fd = ctx->pos - 2;; fd++) {
|
||||||
fd < files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
|
|
||||||
fd++, ctx->pos++) {
|
|
||||||
struct file *f;
|
struct file *f;
|
||||||
struct fd_data data;
|
struct fd_data data;
|
||||||
char name[10 + 1];
|
char name[10 + 1];
|
||||||
unsigned int len;
|
unsigned int len;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
f = files_lookup_fd_rcu(files, fd);
|
f = task_lookup_next_fd_rcu(p, &fd);
|
||||||
|
ctx->pos = fd + 2LL;
|
||||||
if (!f)
|
if (!f)
|
||||||
continue;
|
break;
|
||||||
data.mode = f->f_mode;
|
data.mode = f->f_mode;
|
||||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
data.fd = fd;
|
data.fd = fd;
|
||||||
@ -249,13 +244,11 @@ static int proc_readfd_common(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
|
|||||||
if (!proc_fill_cache(file, ctx,
|
if (!proc_fill_cache(file, ctx,
|
||||||
name, len, instantiate, p,
|
name, len, instantiate, p,
|
||||||
&data))
|
&data))
|
||||||
goto out_fd_loop;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
cond_resched();
|
cond_resched();
|
||||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
out_fd_loop:
|
|
||||||
put_files_struct(files);
|
|
||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
put_task_struct(p);
|
put_task_struct(p);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user