diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index 01dd76be1a58..73c13642d47f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -212,26 +212,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
 		return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, addr_len);
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
-
-	/* We may have received data on the sk_receive_queue pre-accept and
-	 * then we can not use read_skb in this context because we haven't
-	 * assigned a sk_socket yet so have no link to the ops. The work-around
-	 * is to check the sk_receive_queue and in these cases read skbs off
-	 * queue again. The read_skb hook is not running at this point because
-	 * of lock_sock so we avoid having multiple runners in read_skb.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
-		tcp_data_ready(sk);
-		/* This handles the ENOMEM errors if we both receive data
-		 * pre accept and are already under memory pressure. At least
-		 * let user know to retry.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
-			copied = -EAGAIN;
-			goto out;
-		}
-	}
-
 msg_bytes_ready:
 	copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
 	/* The typical case for EFAULT is the socket was gracefully