ipv6: add key length check into rt6_select()
After rwlock is replaced with rcu and spinlock, fib6_lookup() could potentially return an intermediate node if other thread is doing fib6_del() on a route which is the only route on the node so that fib6_repair_tree() will be called on this node and potentially assigns fn->leaf to the its child's fn->leaf. In order to detect this situation in rt6_select(), we have to check if fn->fn_bit is consistent with the key length stored in the route. And depending on if the fn is in the subtree or not, the key is either rt->rt6i_dst or rt->rt6i_src. If any inconsistency is found, that means the node no longer holds valid routes in it. So net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry is returned. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d1040e808
commit
17ecf590b3
@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_select(struct net *net, struct fib6_node *fn,
|
||||
struct rt6_info *leaf = fn->leaf;
|
||||
struct rt6_info *match, *rt0;
|
||||
bool do_rr = false;
|
||||
int key_plen;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!leaf)
|
||||
return net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
|
||||
@ -763,6 +764,19 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_select(struct net *net, struct fib6_node *fn,
|
||||
if (!rt0)
|
||||
fn->rr_ptr = rt0 = leaf;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Double check to make sure fn is not an intermediate node
|
||||
* and fn->leaf does not points to its child's leaf
|
||||
* (This might happen if all routes under fn are deleted from
|
||||
* the tree and fib6_repair_tree() is called on the node.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
key_plen = rt0->rt6i_dst.plen;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES
|
||||
if (rt0->rt6i_src.plen)
|
||||
key_plen = rt0->rt6i_src.plen;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (fn->fn_bit != key_plen)
|
||||
return net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
|
||||
|
||||
match = find_rr_leaf(fn, leaf, rt0, rt0->rt6i_metric, oif, strict,
|
||||
&do_rr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user