igb: update handling of RCTL for smaller buffer sizes
As we begin to move into virtualization the use of a global value for buffer sizes becomes undesirable. This change makes it so only 256 and 512 byte buffers require use of the RCTL register. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e97fd7c6d5
commit
b4557be23d
@ -1801,25 +1801,21 @@ static void igb_setup_rctl(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rctl &= ~(E1000_RCTL_SBP | E1000_RCTL_LPE | E1000_RCTL_SZ_256);
|
||||
|
||||
if (adapter->netdev->mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN) {
|
||||
/* Setup buffer sizes */
|
||||
switch (adapter->rx_buffer_len) {
|
||||
case IGB_RXBUFFER_256:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_256;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IGB_RXBUFFER_512:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_512;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IGB_RXBUFFER_1024:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_1024;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_2048;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (adapter->netdev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_LPE;
|
||||
srrctl = adapter->rx_buffer_len >> E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Setup buffer sizes */
|
||||
switch (adapter->rx_buffer_len) {
|
||||
case IGB_RXBUFFER_256:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_256;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IGB_RXBUFFER_512:
|
||||
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SZ_512;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
srrctl = ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024)
|
||||
>> E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* 82575 and greater support packet-split where the protocol
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user