MIPS: tlbex: Explicitly compare _PAGE_NO_EXEC against 0
[ Upstream commit 74de14fe05dd6b151d73cb0c73c8ec874cbdcde6 ] When CONFIG_XPA is enabled, Clang warns: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:629:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context] if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) { ^ arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC' # define _PAGE_NO_EXEC (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) ^ arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2568:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context] if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) { ^ arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC' # define _PAGE_NO_EXEC (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) ^ 2 errors generated. _PAGE_NO_EXEC can be '0' or '1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT' depending on the build and runtime configuration, which is what the negation operators are trying to convey. To silence the warning, explicitly compare against 0 so the result of the '<<' operator is not implicitly converted to a boolean. According to its documentation, GCC enables -Wint-in-bool-context with -Wall but this warning is not visible when building the same configuration with GCC. It appears GCC only warns when compiling C++, not C, although the documentation makes no note of this: https://godbolt.org/z/x39q3brxf Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b7f559152
commit
5d8244d42d
@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static __maybe_unused void build_convert_pte_to_entrylo(u32 **p,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
|
||||
if (cpu_has_rixi && _PAGE_NO_EXEC != 0) {
|
||||
if (fill_includes_sw_bits) {
|
||||
UASM_i_ROTR(p, reg, reg, ilog2(_PAGE_GLOBAL));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -2568,7 +2568,7 @@ static void check_pabits(void)
|
||||
unsigned long entry;
|
||||
unsigned pabits, fillbits;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
|
||||
if (!cpu_has_rixi || _PAGE_NO_EXEC == 0) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We'll only be making use of the fact that we can rotate bits
|
||||
* into the fill if the CPU supports RIXI, so don't bother
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user