igb: update the approach taken to acquiring and releasing the phy lock
The current approach is just using a ?: type mechanism to set the phy locking bit. This if fine for now but limits us to only 2. Switch to a nested if statement for future compatiblity with more than 2 phys. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70d92f86dc
commit
008c3422d4
@ -240,9 +240,10 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
|||||||
**/
|
**/
|
||||||
static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
u16 mask;
|
u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
|
if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
|
||||||
|
mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
|
return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -256,9 +257,11 @@ static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
|||||||
**/
|
**/
|
||||||
static void igb_release_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
static void igb_release_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
u16 mask;
|
u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
|
||||||
|
mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
|
|
||||||
igb_release_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
|
igb_release_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user